Friday, 19 July 2013
It's a Matter of Respect
I'm home from one trip and about to embark on another, so obviously I'm too busy for blogging--there's cleaning and packing to do, right? Right, but that would be so boring....
Some long drives in the past week gave me time to think about animal welfare regulation just a little more. In my past posts, I attempted to think about the ethics of welfare regulation "ad hominem" -- in the
Thursday, 11 July 2013
Is it speciesist to support animal welfare regulations?
Over at this blog (see end of comments) Gary Francione has said he's writing an essay tentatively called "The Welfare/Regulationist Approach is Deeply Speciesist." He says he will be done in a few days or next week, by which time I'm not going to be around to read or respond (real life responsibilities are going to get in the way).
The tentative title got me thinking though. It's certainly
The tentative title got me thinking though. It's certainly
Wednesday, 10 July 2013
Dueling Analogies
Alright, one more post on animal welfare regulations (like Prop. 2 in California, which requires animal housing large enough so the animal can turn around). In my last post I talked about five cases in which progressives have supported both "revolution" for victims of an injustice and reform. I argued that victims want both and are entitled to both. Animals are entitled to both too, if
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
Animal Rights Reading List
I've been blogging more about animal issues lately, though these days I'm mostly focused on working on my book (er, manuscript until it has a publisher) about parenthood. One reason why: because I'm gearing up to teach my course on animal rights again in the fall. The course is cross-listed as both an upper-level philosophy course and a "cultural formations" class, which means (basically) it's
Monday, 8 July 2013
Francione vs. Friedrich
Several years ago I wrote a series of posts countering Gary Francione's opposition to animal welfare legislation (Should Humane Farm Reform Be Opposed and The Thirsty Cow, for example). The point I made, in various ways, is that someone who recognizes animals as having rights ought to support humane reforms. Last week I made the argument again (The Rights Argument for Regulation) and now I see
Wednesday, 3 July 2013
The Rights Argument for Regulation
After recently having a lively debate with someone about the ethics of regulating the farm animal industry, I found myself trying to set up my argument formally (in my mind). So why not share?
(1) Most farm animals live in abysmal conditions and die miserable deaths.
(2) Some regulations do/would offer significant improvement to the lives of farm animals (e.g. regulations that improve the
(1) Most farm animals live in abysmal conditions and die miserable deaths.
(2) Some regulations do/would offer significant improvement to the lives of farm animals (e.g. regulations that improve the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)