Saturday, 28 April 2012
Who to Trust?
I've been watching the debate between Bart Ehrman and Richard Carrier with fascination. I'm a fan of Bart Ehrman's, based on reading two of his books--Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millenium and one correcting errors in The DaVinci Code. Richard Carrier is someone I've noticed over the years peripherally, without paying direct attention to him. People seemed to think he was
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Martha Nussbaum on Religious Intolerance
She talks about her latest book The New Religious Intolerance here. I think she goes too far in the direction of "can't we all just get along?" What she says about martyrdom made me especially queasy. People who let themselves be killed during the Holocaust, in solidarity with Jews, have no connection with suicide bombers who blow up other people in the service of "jihad". And no, we don't
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Collective Obligation, Personal Virtue
So here's the puzzle I'm scratching my head about (though I ought to be grading papers): Each society has a more or less ideal birth rate. Maybe for the US it's ideal if the average couple has two children. We don't want a higher birth rate for environmental reasons, among others, and we don't want a lower birth rate for lots of reasons -- because new people will be needed to support the
Sunday, 22 April 2012
The Case for Meat
The New York Times parade of meat-defenses is in -- let's have a look. One of them is a defense of eating lab meat, not natural meat, so let's throw that out, no matter how well written it is. I also happen to know who the author is, and she's actively seeking votes. I think that's a no-no in a contest like this. The idea is to find out which of the six essays appeals most to Times readers,
Sunday, 15 April 2012
The Case against Kids
Overall, Benatar, and Caplan all covered in The New Yorker. I'm looking forward to reading this ....
Saturday, 14 April 2012
Coyne v. Haidt
I thought it was not so nice of Jerry Coyne to dismiss Jonathan Haidt as "a bit of a woo-ish self-help guru". In fact, both unnice and not reality-based. Haidt's book The Happiness Hypothesis is extremely interesting and well-written, and no less valuable because it does have a self-help element (I use it in a course I teach). And that's saying nothing about his extensive and influential research
Children Come from Us
pics on SodaheadI've been thinking-writing about why people want to be parents -- what are the most central motivations and satisfactions? This is a hard thing to think about without being constrained by a sort of political correctness. The politically correct view, I think, is that we have children to enjoy nurturing them. That's PC because nearly everyone who wants to be a parent can have
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)